Sunday, January 17th., Cadogan Square, London.
I had a letter from one of my readers asking me if "Clayhanger" was autobiographical. Well of course it was! All literature is, more or less.
The main question for the author is how to get the semblance of life down onto the page before the eyes of the reader. The novelist has selected his subject and drenched himself in it. He has laid down the main features of his design. The living embryo is there and waits to be developed into full organic structure. Whence and how does the novelist obtain the vital tissue which must be his or her material? The answer is that he digs it out of himself.
An inquiry into the career of any first-class novelist invariably reveals that his novels are full of autobiography. But, as a fact, every good novel contains far more autobiography than any inquiry could reveal. Episodes, moods, elements of autobiography can be detected and traced to their origin by critical acumen, but the intimate autobiography that runs through each page, vitalising it, may not be detected. In dealing with each character in each episode the novelist must, if he is to convince, interrogate that part of his own individuality which corresponds to the particular character. Effectively he asks: "Now, what would I have thought or done?" Good fiction is autobiography dressed in the colours of all mankind.
No comments:
Post a Comment